[PnP] Enhancement limitations, new gems

[Burton Choinski]

Well, it was only an option I tossed out there…it was only a header to the main article, which was the new gems.  As always, it’s up the GM since he’s the one who determines the “feel” for his game.


> On Dec 12, 2014, at 6:21 PM, Scott Adams <longshotgm at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> That I understand all too well.  I have a player tat makes comfy clohtng and such.  It is just weird to me in some way to use magic that way.  Itis hard to explain what I mean.  To me a chair is made and thsu can be enhanced.  But a rock is by nature and so what? Make it smooth?  Make it more pointy? I know I'll do this spell to make this pebell the size of a marble strong nad heavy enough that only a Hill giant cna use.  I know this rock here I can make it so ponty it will slice thorugh shileds!  There is a point where realism and magic tends to be odd at times.
> 
> Pick a stick from the ground and magic it to fly and dance.  I can see why magic is goodfor things you MAKE.  But for natural things like plants or rocks.  There is a fine line.
> 
> 
> 
> At 06:00 AM 12/12/2014, you wrote:
>> >   The problem is the word Natural.  A rock is a rock.  Would
>> >   a EL0 compared to a EL10 make it more shiny?  Would berries
>> >   that are great teasting be even better tasting with a EL10?
>> >   Nature in this case per mythos was created as is.  One can
>> >   assume evolution takes some part but it is a slow thing.
>> 
>> But that is how the enhancement spell is defined for non-weapon or armor -- it makes a chair more comfortable (more chair-y?), it makes a pouch hold more, etc.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pnp mailing list
>> pnp at list.powersandperils.org
>> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pnp mailing list
> pnp at list.powersandperils.org
> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp