[PnP] A new review of P&P

[Scott Adams]

Correct.  For that I retract that. I said it in haste.  Maybe not an 
idiot.  But more ...closer to ignorant in terms of experience not on 
knowledge.  That fits a bit better.  I've seen foks over the 30 years 
sit down to pnp and look at char sheet or hear 5 min and give up and 
run off.  To them its ignorance rather than lack of trying.

Anyone can write things well and he had valid points.  But when I see 
the lack of use...that's when his Influcnece Chance goes flying away.  :)



At 09:37 PM 8/11/2015, you wrote:
>I'm not sure calling everyone who disagrees with you an idiot is the 
>best thing to do.
>
>As for his review, I thought it was well thought out, and well written.
>I disagree with it, but that doesn't make him an idiot.
>
>On 8/11/2015 5:56 PM, Scott Adams wrote:
>>
>>Thanks.  Yet another idiot who played only 1 hour.  I had to reply.
>>Maybe if others post replies he might see its not failed.
>>
>>
>>At 06:55 AM 8/11/2015, you wrote:
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>here is the link to a new review of the game.
>>>
>>>http://www.anthonypryor.com/?p=2649
>>>
>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks & 
>>>orcas on your desktop!
>>>Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>pnp mailing list
>>>pnp at list.powersandperils.org
>>>http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>pnp mailing list
>>pnp at list.powersandperils.org
>>http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pnp mailing list
>pnp at list.powersandperils.org
>http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp