<html>
<body>
Yes an impressive document. I wlil use it for mass combat and
such. <br>
Still have a Elf vs Fort Affea (sp?) Climan battle one of these days to
do.<br><br>
<br>
At 06:20 AM 2/1/2018, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">I think my “Dogs of War”
submission had something like that, with basic civilians, militia, and
various flavors of warriors.<br><br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Burton Choinski<br>
<a href="mailto:bchoinski@verizon.net">bchoinski@verizon.net</a><br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On Feb 1, 2018, at 12:43 AM,
Scott Adams
<<a href="mailto:longshotgm@comcast.net">longshotgm@comcast.net</a>
> wrote:<br><br>
<br>
This is what I was thinking before you proposed x2. All npcs in any
game are lower than pcs. Just rule #4 of the rpg rule book. :)<br>
For what I'd call uber npcs I use my pc generator. So make them pc
class. But 95% of my ncps are book 4 quaity and use my npc
generator. This goes back to idea normal humans old age was
40.<br>
We know some would make it twice that much so maybe those npcs would have
x3 or x4 cons.<br>
So I suppose one could add a 'genetic' aspect. Using the same
system as creature variatoin for npcs (more or less).<br><br>
I do like your data analysis. Good work.<br>
The idea of these Enl npcs def makes them weak. It would mean 90%
of MUS ie npcs are wimps.<br>
I mean they'd only be able to cast what 5-6 spells before tapped
out.<br>
Thus again for my MUS I use pc class. For grunts and mostly
anything else book 4.<br><br>
<br>
At 08:34 PM 1/30/2018, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">In Book 4, stats are given for
'normal' humans. The numbers listed for S, St, D & A for men
and women are 'avarage' 2d10 rolls of 11+/- the mods for their
race. These are then given no multiplier other than 1 (as opposed
to a minimum 1.5 for characters). Now, I have no problem with the
low multiplier...except that it doesn't work with the Constitution and
still come up with a correct HPV if using (S+St+C)/4 (RU). The
reason why I say that is that for male humans, if the Constitution is
only multiplied by '1', then the man would have a
HPV=(14+11+11)/4=36/4=9. Women would be
HPV=(11+12+12)/4=35/4=9.<br><br>
Now, this makes normal humans pretty weak...but that's not
all...<br><br>
Consider the EnL of both humans. The book calls for EnL=35 for both
men and women, but if the multipliers are all '1', then the male would
have an EnL of only 22, and the woman only 25.<br><br>
So...in order to make the numbers make sense, I would propose that the
multiplier for the Constitution of normal humans be changed to '2'.
What would this do?<br><br>
Male humans would have a HPV of 12 instead of 10, and an EnL of 33.<br>
Female humans would have a HPV of 12, and an EnL of 37.<br><br>
This way it keeps the calcs the same, but doesn't make them much
different than they are in Book 4.<br><br>
My 2BB.<br><br>
Dave<br><br>
Sent from my iPad<br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
pnp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pnp@list.powersandperils.org">
pnp@list.powersandperils.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp" eudora="autourl">
http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp</a>
</blockquote><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
pnp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pnp@list.powersandperils.org">
pnp@list.powersandperils.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp" eudora="autourl">
http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp</a>
</blockquote><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
pnp mailing list<br>
pnp@list.powersandperils.org<br>
<a href="http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp" eudora="autourl">
http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp</a>
</blockquote></body>
</html>