[pnpgm] Urgent vote needed

[Burton Choinski]

Oops, I mean not S+7.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burton Choinski
bchoinski at verizon.net




> On Sep 25, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Burton Choinski <bchoinski at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> In game terms, I would grow with the greater magic rules, no stacking.  If you have something that grants S+3 and C+2, and you get something els that give S+4, your final tally is S+4, C+2, not S+6
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Burton Choinski
> bchoinski at verizon.net <mailto:bchoinski at verizon.net>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:58 PM, David Sanders <dasandersx at comcast.net <mailto:dasandersx at comcast.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> I vote do it per the rules.  One item. More than one and they cancel out.
>> 
>> The one exception would be NMI...they would be unaffected by other attribute effect items or other NMI.
>> 
>> Dave
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Sep 25, 2017, at 11:22 AM, pnpgm <pnpgm at comcast.net <mailto:pnpgm at comcast.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In Attribute Effect there is that one rule that no more than 2 items allowed.
>>> I do recall this rule from 80s.
>>> But I didn't have as many players with magical toys.
>>> It was all simple low level basic stuff.
>>> Not this uber stuff.
>>> 
>>> We have some with 4-5 items that add stats of same attribute.
>>> 
>>> I wonder if I should pull back and use this rule.
>>> 
>>> I don't like arbitary decisions.  So will le tyou guys decide.
>>> Rule is ' no 2 items of this type used at same time'.
>>> 
>>> I've kinda ignored it till now.
>>> 
>>> But should the force be balanced?
>>> 
>>> So need some votes from folks.
>>> I'll let you guys decide.
>>> 
>>> We have 6 active players
>>> Arawn, Unali, Z, Kiet, Fremea, Dorhak
>>> Mae, Mounath and Pyan are active per se but not as much.
>>> 
>>> So what say you?
>>> 1. Ignore rule
>>> 2. Use it restrict it to 2 items
>>> 3. Restrict to 3
>>> 4. Restrict to 5 items
>>> 
>>> Probably need 4 votes ot make decision if unclear
>>> then will have to decide myself.
>>> 
>>> This could be a radical change as many have toys that would cause havoc if htey lose them.
>>> 
>>> But best to decide now before adventure starts.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pnpgm mailing list
>>> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org <mailto:pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org>
>>> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pnpgm mailing list
>> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org <mailto:pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org>
>> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pnpgm mailing list
> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.powersandperils.org/pipermail/pnpgm/attachments/20170925/f528268d/attachment.htm>